← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/21029/2024dismissed

Sirumalar v. The Superintendent Of Police

2024-09-04Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.09.2024 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Sirumalar : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Inspector of Police, RS Mangalam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

4.Appadurai : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to conduct enquiry in the petitioner's petition, dated 22.06.2024 pending before the third respondent and pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Mahendrarajan For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor.

1/4

O R D E R

This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to conduct enquiry in the petitioner's petition, dated 22.06.2024 pending before the third respondent and pass orders.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State would submit that the petitioner and the fourth respondent are brother and sister; that the fourth respondent has to return some jewels and cash to the petitioner and for that purpose, the petitioner has lodged a complaint and enquiry is pending in current paper. He would further submit that the fourth respondent has already filed a petition in Crl.O.P(MD)No.3979 of 2024, not to harass him under the guise of enquiry and on 29.04.2024, this Court recorded the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that were not harassing the petitioner and that they have conducted a petition enquiry as against the petitioner therein in CSR. No.467 of 2023 and the same was closed on 16.10.2023.

2/4

3. Considering the above, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate proceedings for getting back the jewels and cash. No costs.

04.09.2024 NCC : Yes/ No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No das To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Inspector of Police, RS Mangalam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

K.MURALI SHANKAR, J das Order made in 04.09.2024 4/4