K. Packiyam v. The Superintendent Of Police

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14387 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.10.2019

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14387 of 2019 K.Packiyam ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, (Rural), Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Town North Police Station, Dindigul Town, Dindigul District.

3.K.Jeganath 4.K.Viji @ Vijayalakshmi 5.M.Vanisri 6.R.Murali

...Respondents

Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Saravagan Prabhu For Respondents : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) (for R1 and R2)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the on the complaint given by the de-facto complainant, petition enquiry was conducted and the same was closed. The same is recorded. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14387 of 2019

3. It is made clear, now that the complaint has been closed, the respondent shall not call the petitioner in the guise of enquiry and harass her.

4.With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS II) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) aav To:

1.The Superintendent of Police, (Rural), Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Town North Police Station, Dindigul Town, Dindigul District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.S.SARVAGAN PRABHU, Advocate ( SR-92071[F] dated 16/10/2019 ) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14387 of 2019 14.10.2019 KK/SAR/23.10.2019/2P-5C/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2