E.Rajasherin v. The Inspector Of Police

CRL MP(MD) No.809 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Nineteenth day of January Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL MP(MD) No.809 of 2023 IN CRL OP(MD) No.894 of 2023 E.RAJASHERIN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 Vs 1 THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MARTHANDAM, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

... 1st RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT 2 M.D.M.SHEELA PRIYADHARSHINI ... 2nd RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to dispense with personal appearance of the petitioners before the Trial Court in C.C.No.253/2021 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate-I,Padmanabapuram,pending disposal of the above quash petition.

Prayer in CRL OP(MD). 894/ 2023 :

To call for the records pertaining to the charge sheet C.C.No.253 of 2021 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate-I, Padmanabapuram and quash the same as illegal. Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.ANTO PRINCE.G, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.M.MUTHUMANIKKAM, Government Advocate(crl.side) on behalf of the 1st Respondent, the court made the following order:- Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is ordered to be dispensed with, on conditions that he shall appear at the time of initial questioning, proceedings under Section 313 of Cr.P.C., and at the time of passing judgment and on the hearings, specifically directed by the trial court. The petitioner is further directed to give an undertaking in the form of affidavit that he will be duly represented by a counsel on all hearing dates and that https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

CRL MP(MD) No.809 of 2023 the Counsel representing her will cross examine the prosecution witnesses on the same day they are examined in chief. The petitioner shall not dispute the identity of the witnesses. The petitioner shall appear before the Court in the event his presence is insisted by the trial judge for the purpose of identification. If the petitioner adopts any dilatorial tactics, it is open to the Trial Court to insist for his appearance and deal with the petitioner in accordance with the judgment of Supreme Court of India, in State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Shambunath Singh, reported in 2001 (4) SCC 667. sd/- 19/01/2023 / TRUE COPY / /01/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

DAS TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, PADMANABHAPURAM.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. C.C. to M/S.ANTO PRINCE.G Advocate SR.No.856

ORDER

IN CRL MP(MD) No.809 of 2023 IN CRL OP(MD) No.894 of 2023 Date :19/01/2023 SA/VR/SAR.3/24.01.2023/2P/6C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2