M.Natarajan v. K.Murugesa Gounder

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fifth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice N.SATHISH KUMAR IN SA(MD) No.667 of 2011 1 M.NATARAJAN 2 R.PANNERSELVAM 3 R.BALASUBRAMANIAN ... PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3/ RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 Vs 1 K.MURUGESA GOUNDER 2 M.MEENAKSHI ... RESPONDENTS 1 & 2/ PETITIONERS/ APPELLANTS K.RAMASAMY (DIED) 3 A.SUBBAIAH MUDALIAR 4 R.LAKSHMI 5 P.SANKARA GOUNDER 6 R.POONGODI 7 M/S.SUPREME TEX (FIRM) KARUR, REP.BY ITS MANAING PARTNER, R.POONGODI, P.PERIASAMY (DIED) 8 M.BALARU 9 K.SELVARAJ 10 K.MOHAN 11 M.KALYANI 12 P.MURUGESAN 13 SABAPATHY 14 P.PADMAVATHI V.SUNDARAM (DIED), P.PALANIAPPAN(DIED) 15 N.PERUMAL 16 R.BAKTHAVASALAM 17 R.THIYAGARAJAN 18 M.PALANIAPPAN 1/3

19 M.MURUGAIYAN 20 M.RAMASAMY 21 P.SEKAR 22 P.SUBRAMANIAN 23 M.SAMPATH 24 M.RAVI 25 R.MARIMUTHU 26 S.GANESAN 27 K.KARUPPANAN 28 S.SARATHI 29 NAGAMMAL 30 M.VENGALAYEE 31 SARASWATHY 32 SULOCHANA 33 PALANIAMMAL 34 VIJAYAKUMAR 35 DEVARAJ KARPAGAM (DIED) 36 KARPAGAM 37 MINOR.BANUMATHI 38 MINOR.SENTHILKUMAR 39 KALIAMMAL ... RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS (Minors 38 and 39 are represented by guardian mother 37th respondent Karpagam) (since the Respondents 3 to 39 are not necessary parties notice may be dispensed with) Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court in M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2011 in S.A.(MD) No.667 of 2011 dated 12.07.2013. PRAYER IN SA(MD) No.667 of 2011:

To prefer this memorandum of Second Appeal against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.102 of 2004 on the file of District Court, Karur dated 30.01.2010 reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.140 of 1993 on the file of Sub court, Karur dated 15.06.2004.

ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and Petitioner is not appeared either in person or by an advocate, the court made the following order:- Today when the petition is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on the side of the petitioners.

2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this case further.

2/3

3. In view of the above, this petition stands dismissed for default.

4. The Registry is directed to post the main appeal on 09.04.2021.

sd/- 05/03/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT JUDGE, KARUR.

2 THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, KARUR.

ORDER

IN IN SA(MD) No.667 of 2011 Date :05/03/2021 tsg MS/PN/SAR-2/10.03.2021/3P.3C 3/3