Seemaraja v. The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.10.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN and Crl.M.P.(MD) Nos.14573 & 14667 of 2025 Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17755 of 2025 Seemaraja ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thirunagar Police Station, Madurai District.
(Crime No.166 of 2025) 2.Paveen Kumar ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to call for records relating to the impugned FIR in Crime No.166 of 2025 dated 13.03.2025 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.P.Prithika For R1 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Page No. 1 of 11
For R2 : Mr.U.Antony Santhosh Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17901 of 2025 1.Praveen Kumar 2.Prakash 3.Pasumpon ... Petitioners Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thirunagar Police Station, Madurai District.
(Crime No.165 of 2025) 2.Mariammal ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to call for records relating to the impugned FIR in Crime No.165 of 2025 dated 13.03.2025 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.U.Antony Santhose For R1 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R2 : M/s.P.Prithika ***** Page No. 2 of 11
C O M M O N O R D E R These Criminal Original Petitions have been filed seeking to quash the FIRs in Crime No.166 of 2025, registered against the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17755 of 2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023; and in Crime No.165 of 2025, registered against the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17901 of 2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002. Both FIRs pertain to the same occurrence.
2. The allegation in the FIRs is that, on account of a previous dispute, the petitioners in both Crl.O.Ps. attacked each other, abused each other, and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.
3. The parties have now entered into a compromise and decided to give a quietus to the entire dispute. The parties have filed joint compromise memos both dated 16th October 2025. The scanned copy of the compromise memos read as follows:
Page No. 3 of 11
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17755 of 2025 Page No. 4 of 11
Page No. 5 of 11
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17901 of 2025 Page No. 6 of 11
Page No. 7 of 11
4. The petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17755 of 2025, namely, Seemaraja [Aadhaar No.3401 8337 8857], the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17901 of 2025, namely, (1) Praveen Kumar [Aadhaar No.3027 0474 4996], (2) Prakash [Aadhaar No.4456 1067 9924] and (3) Pasumpon [Aadhaar No.5420 8663 2554] and the second respondent/defacto complainant in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17901 of 2025, namely, Mariammal [Aadhaar No.7707 0850 5171] are present before this Court in person. The second respondent/defacto complainant in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17755 of 2025 is the first petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17901 of 2025. The parties are identified by M/s.S.Kaleeswari, Sub Inspector of Police, Thirunagar Police Station. All the parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them.
Page No. 8 of 11
5. Considering the nature of the offences and also considering the relationship between the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the First Information Reports (FIRs) pending investigation. Accordingly, the impugned First Information Reports (FIRs) in Crime No.165 of 2025 and Crime No.166 of 2025, on the file of first respondent police, are quashed. The petitioner in Crl.O.P. (MD) No.17755 of 2025 shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- and the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17901 of 2025 shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as costs to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court forthwith and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry.
6. Hence, these Criminal Original Petitions stand allowed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 17.10.2025 JEN Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order Page No. 9 of 11
Copy To:
1.The Inspector of Police, Thirunagar Police Station, Madurai District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Page No. 10 of 11
SUNDER MOHAN , J.
JEN 17.10.2025 Page No. 11 of 11