T.Thatchinamoorthy v. Tamil Nadu Generation And

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.11.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY T.Thatchinamoorthy

...Petitioner

vs.

1.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Rep. by the Chairman - cum - Managing Director, 10th Floor, NPKRR Maaligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Rep. by the Chief Engineer / Personnel, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

3.The Superintending Engineer, Ramnad Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Ramnad - 623 503.

4.The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Rameshwaram Electricity Division, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Rameshwaram - 623 526.

5.The Inspector of Labour, The Authority designated under

Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981, Ramanadhapuram - 623 503.

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to grant permanent status to the petitioner herein with effect from 27.03.1999 award dated 31.08.2015 passed by the fifth respondent herein, in Na.Ka.No.208/2013, with arrears of wages and all other attendant benefits.

For Petitioner :

Mrs.C.S.Monica for Mr.D.Balamurugapandi For Respondents :

Mr.Anand Gopalan for R1 to R4

O R D E R

This writ petition was filed to issue a direction to implement the order of the Labour Court dated 31.08.2015.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 would submit that in the present case, the award passed by the Labour Court itself was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Inspector of Labour for passing

orders afresh, by an order of this Court dated 07.03.2022 in W.P. (MD)No.4061 of 2013 and etc. batch. Since the order of the Labour Court has already been set aside, the learned counsels on either side would submit that the prayer in this writ petition cannot be granted.

3. In view of the above submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the prayer cannot be given effect to. No costs. 20.11.2024 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY , J.

mbi 20.11.2024