Madras High CourtWP(MD)/673/2015disposed of

M.Ameer Sulthan, v. The District Collector,

2020-11-26Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.11.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and MP(MD)No.1 of 2015 M.Ameer Sulthan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

3. The Inspector of Police, R.S.Mangalam Police Station, R.S.Mangalam, Ramanathapuram District.

4.Ismail ... Respondents PRAYER:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take action on the Petitioner's representation dated 11.01.2015 and a direction to the 3rd Respondent, the Inspector of Police, R.S.Mangalam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District, not to interfere in civil dispute between the petitioner and the 4th Respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Neelamegam For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R4 : Mr.I.A.K.Bagadursha

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take action on the Petitioner's representation dated 11.01.2015 and a direction to the 3rd Respondent, the Inspector of Police, R.S.Mangalam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District, not 1/3

to interfere in civil dispute between the petitioner and the 4th Respondent.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that on the complaints received from the petitioner as well as the 4th respondent, have been enquired and the cases also have been registered in Crime Nos. 6 and 9 of 2015 and the same are pending for investigation. It is seen that there is a property dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent herein. Therefore, in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent, the respondents 1 to 3 have no role to play, except any offence committed by the petitioner or by the 4th respondent herein. 3.In view of the same, the respondents 1 to 3 are directed not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the 4th respondent herein, except any crime committed by the petitioner or by the 4th respondent herein.

4.with the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl. Side)) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To

1. The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2/3

3. The Inspector of Police, R.S.Mangalam Police Station, R.S.Mangalam, Ramanathapuram District.

and MP(MD)No.1 of 2015 26.11.2020 dss AE (18/01/2021) 3P / 4C 3/3