B. Palanivel Thillaikumar, v. The Commissioner Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.09.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN B.Palanivel Thillaikumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, 2.The Inspector of Police, Economic Offences Wing, 3.C.Mani 4.S.Appadurai 5.S.Kumar 6.Nithyanantham 7.M.Shanthi 8.S.M.Muthukutty 9.M.Revathy 10.M.Subhatra (R.7 to R.10 are impleaded vide order of this Court dated 14.09.2023 in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015) 1/6

11.P.Venkatesa Kanan 12.P.Athi Lakshmi 13.P.Parvathi 14.A.Saral Mery 15.K.Sahayarani 16.R.Thangavel 17.S.Parameshwari 18.S.Pichandi 19.P.Kalidass 20.A.Esthar Anthony 21.S.Mariammal 22.S.Sivanu 23.N.Sivandoss 24.V.Kenga 25.K.V.Lakshmi Narayanan 26.A.Sornam 27.S.Velmurugan 28.K.Manikandan 29.V.Maniappan 30.S.Lakshmi 2/6

31.A.Petchimuthu 32.P.Mariammal 33.S.Valli 34.S.Santhana Selvi 35.G.Sumathi 36.M.Suthan Raj 37.M.Sankar 38.M.Sri Swethavalli 39.P.Esakkimuthu 40.G.Manikandan 41.T.Selvi 42.E.Raj Kumar 43.S.Sekar 44.E.Muthu 45.M.Ganesh Pandi 46.M.Lakshmi 47.S.Selvam 48.V.Prema 49.S.Mayakrishnan 50.A.Boopathy 3/6

51.K.Arunachalam 52.J.Asan Mydeen 53.E.Pappa 54.P.Alla Pitchai 55.P.Gomathi Nayagam 56.P.Sornam (R.11 to R.56 are impleaded vide order of this Court dated 14.09.2023 in M.P(MD)No.2 of 2015) ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to give necessary protection to the life of the petitioner and his family members.

For Petitioner : Mr. H.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr. A.Albert James Government Advocate for R.1 and R.2 Mr. A.R.Kannappan for R.3 and R.5 Mr. S.C.Herold Singh for R.4 and R.6

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner reports no instructions.

4/6

2. I went through the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition.

3. The petitioner was running an financial establishment. Default was committed. The petitioner apprehending threat to his life and liberty, the petitioner sought Police protection. Thereafter, the present writ petition came to be filed.

4. After going through the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, I am more than satisfied that no case for grant of relief has been made out.

5. This writ petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

14.09.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No MGA To 1.The Commissioner of Police, 5/6

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

MGA 2.The Inspector of Police, Economic Offences Wing, 14.09.2023 6/6