← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/21328/2025disposed of

Balakumar v. The Government Of India

2025-08-05Honourable Mr Justice C. Saravanan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN Balakumar ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs, Regional Passport Office, Madurai, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai 625 002.

2.The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to re-issue passport to the petitioner and to permit the petitioner to go to abroad by considering the petitioner's application in File No. MD1075199665525 dated 18.06.2025 as well as petitioner's representation dated 25.07.2025 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.

1/5

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Jeyakarthik For R1 : Mr.S.Selva Krishnan CGSC For R2 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

Mr.S.Selva Krishnan, learned Central Government Standing Counsel takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) takes notice for the second respondent. 2.This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus to direct the first respondent to re-issue the passport to the petitioner and to permit the petitioner to go to abroad, by considering the petitioner's passport application bearing File No. MD1075199665525, dated 18.06.2025, as well as petitioner's representation dated 25.07.2025.

3.It is submitted that the petitioner is a holder of a passport bearing Passport No.B8181500, which is valid between 13.06.2024 and 12.06.2034. 2/5

4.It is submitted that since the petitioner is working in Malasiya, he wanted to take his wife, namely, Nandhini and therefore, wanted the name of his wife, Nandhini, to be included in the passport.

5.It is noticed that initially, the petitioner was arrayed as one of the accused in Crime No.110 of 2016 at the behest of one complainant, namely, Easwari, for the offences under Sections 147, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998. 6.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the second respondent, on instructions, would submit that a charge sheet has been made ready, deleting Section 147 IPC and the name of the petitioner has been deleted from the array of the accused persons.

7.Considering the above, I see no impediment in directing the first respondent to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's application for including the name of the petitioner's wife, Nandhini, pursuant to the representation dated 3/5

25.07.2025. This exercise shall be completed by the first respondent within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8.With the aforesaid directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Index : Yes / No 05.08.2025 Internet : Yes / No mm To The Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

4/5

C.SARAVANAN, J.

mm 05.08.2025 5/5