S.Prakasam v. The Commissioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of December Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR and The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.VIJAYAKUMAR CMP(MD) No.9240 of 2022 1 S.PRAKASAM S/O. LATE.CHELLAKANNU, 23G, CHEKKADI STREET, PUTTUTHOPPU, MADURAI.

... PETITIONER(S) Vs 1 THE COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENT BOARD, CHENNAI.

2 THE JOINT COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, MADURAI.

3 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, MADURAI.

4 THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

ARULMIGU PUTTU URCHAVA VAGAYARA KATTALAI, PUTTUTHOPPU, MADURAI 16.

5 THE CHAIRMAN TRUSTEE / THAKK AR, ARULMIGU PUTTU URCHAVA VAGAYARA KATTALAI, PUTTUTHOPPU, MADURAI -16.

... RESPONDENT(S) ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- (Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.) This petition is filed to condone the delay of 55 days in filing the W.A.SR.(MD)No.60348 of 2022.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent has not filed any counter affidavit and he has serious objection in allowing this petition.

3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is allowed.

4. Registry is directed to number the Writ Appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the same for admission in the usual course. 13/12/2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis