← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8324/2015closed

M/S. Sri Adhisankara v. The Union Of India

2023-02-14Honourable Mr Justice K.Kumaresh Babu4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.02.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 to 3 of 2015 M/S.Sri Adhisankara Industrial Training Institute, represented by Chairman, having office near Checkpost, Thiruvanaikoil, Trichy 620 005.

... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The Union of India, represented by its Additional Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi 110 001.

2.The Director General of Employment and Training, Shram Shakthi Bhavan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi.

3.The National Council for Vocational Training (NCVT), represented by its Secretary, Shram Shakthi Bhavan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi.

1/4

4.The Chief Executive Officer, National Accreditation Board for Education and Training, Quality Council of India, ITPI Building, 6th Floor, 4-A, Ring Road, I.P.Estate, New Delhi 110 002.

5.The Director of Employment and Training, Alandur Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

6.The Regional Joint Director of Training, Office of Regional Joint Director, Department of Employment and Training, Government Multi Department Building Campus, Kajamalai, Trichy - 20.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records culminating in the circulars of the 1st & 2nd respondents dated 06.08.2012 made in No. DGET-19(22)2012-CD and 02.12.2014 made in NO.DGET-07.14.2013-CD and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to continue the permanent affiliation already granted to the petitioner and allow the petitioner institution to admit students to next session 2015-2016 on wards on the basis of the permanent affiliation already granted by the 3rd respondent to the approved trades of the petitioner institute without applying for re-affiliation. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Balamurugan For Respondents : Mr.K.R.Laxman Central Government Standing Counsel 2/4

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed challenging the circular issued by the first respondent and the consequential circular issued by the second respondent with regard to the affiliation of the petitioner institution. 2.Pending the circular, a policy decision has been taken by the first respondent that the ITI institutes will be continued with affiliation till they are disaffiliated and that there was no requirement for the ITI institutions to make applications for re-affiliation until further orders. 3.In view of the subsequent development, I am of the view that there is no further adjudication required to be made in this writ petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Speaking : Yes / No 14.02.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm 3/4

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

mm 14.02.2023 4/4