Thangaraj.M v. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.09.2022 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN M.Thangaraj ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Periyakulam, Theni District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Periyakulam Police Station, Theni District.
... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to grant permission and necessary protection to perform the cultural programme (i.e.,) Adal Padal on the eve of Sri Manthaiyamman Temple Festival at Theiventhirapuram, Karatoor, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District, which is to be held on 05.10.2022 from 07.00 p.m., to 10.00 p.m., based on the petitioner's representation in person on 18.09.2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Naveen Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Sivakumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4
O R D E R
This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission and necessary protection to perform the cultural programme (i.e.,) Adal Padal on the eve of Sri Manthaiyamman Temple Festival at Theiventhirapuram, Karatoor, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District, which is to be held on 05.10.2022 from 07.00 p.m., to 10.00 p.m., based on the petitioner's representation in person on 18.09.2022.
2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that temple Festival for the temple, by name, 'Sri Manthaiyamman Temple', at Theiventhirapuram, Karatoor, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District, is going to be held on 05.10.2022. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme, the petitioner sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 18.09.2022. But, the second respondent 2/4
has not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the second respondent has received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.
5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police.
6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc. 007301/Genl.I (1)/2019, dated 09.04.2019, along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the respondent police is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 18.09.2022 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular, immediately. 3/4
G.ILANGOVAN, J ta
7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
28.09.2022 ta To 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Periyakulam, Theni District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Periyakulam Police Station, Theni District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4/4