← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9809/2015allowed

M/S Sree Vanni Vinayaka v. The Superintending Engineer,

2023-09-05Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.09.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 M/s.Sree Vanni Vinayaka Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, A.Ganapathy Subbiah, Old No.2-67, New No.2-144, Middle Street, Vadakupatti, Kovilpatti Taluk-628 501, Thoothukudi District.

... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Tirunelveli Electricity Distribution Circle, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Assistant Executive Engineer (KAPT), TANGEDCO, Tirunelveli Electricity Distribution Circle, Tirunelveli District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating the impugned Harmonic Compensation charges of Rs. 3,80,327/- (Rupees three lakhs eighty thousand three hundred and twenty seven only) fixed upon M/s Sree Vanni Vinayaka Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd., Vadakupatti, Kovilpatti Taluk 628 1/3

501, Thoothukudi District in Service No. 103 by the 1st respondent in Bill No. 103 dated 31.05.2015 based on the report of TEKIKNOW dated 13.05.2015 and pass such other orders.

For Petitioner : Mr.F.Deepak For Respondents : Mr.S.Kasinathadurai

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. The relief sought for in the present writ petition is similar to the relief sought for in W.P.(MD)No.25 of 2015 etc., batch. That was decided by the Court on 05.06.2017. In view of the fact that the case of the petitioner is also similar to that of the case cited supra, the petitioner is also entitled to the same relief. The impugned demand notice is quashed. The Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 05.09.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi 2/3

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

rmi 05.09.2023 3/3