N. Santhana Vinoji v. D.John Irudhaya Kennadi

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.11296 of 2025 Crl.M.P.(MD)No.11060 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.(MD)SR.No.29228 of 2025 SHAMIM AHMED, J.

Heard Mr.G.Cenil, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.Pratap Sudharsan, learned counsel for the Respondent.

2. Mr.G.Cenil, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 138 days in filing the criminal revision petition against the judgment and order dated 16.12.2024 passed by the 1st Additional District and Sessions Court, Tirunelveli in C.A.No.27 of 2024, confirming the judgment dated 16.02.2024 passed by the Additional District Munsif Court, Valliyoor in C.C.No.87 of 2023.

3. Mr.Pratap Sudharsan, the learned Counsel for the Respondent, has stated that he has no objection to allowing this petition.

4. Being satisfying with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 138 days in filing the above criminal revision petition is condoned.

5. Office is directed to number the Criminal Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order, forthwith.

24.09.2025 Nsr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

Crl.M.P.(MD)No.11296 of 2025 SHAMIM AHMED, J .

Nsr Crl.M.P.(MD)No.11296 of 2025 24.09.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2