Mahalakshmi.V v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.08.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI V.Mahalakshmi .. Petitioner v.

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai District - 625 001.

2.The Thasildar, Madurai Taluk Office (East), Madurai District - 625 107.

3.The Surveyor, Surveyor Department, East Taluk Office, Narasingam Road, Othakadai, Madurai - 625 107.

4.The Village Administrative Officer, VAO Office, Veerapanchan Village, 1/6

5.The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO / Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd (TNEB), Karuppai Oorani, 6.The Inspector of Police, Sliman Police Station, 7.Alagarswamy 8.A.Saranya 9.The President, Thamaraipatti Panchayat Union, Opposite to Veerapaanchaan VAO Office, Thamaraipatti, Madurai District - 640 642.

.. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to issue patta in the name of the petitioner in respect of the house plot no. 35 measuring an extent of 440 sq.feet = 1 cent and 4 sq.feet including pathway rights comprised in Re.Survey S.F.No.22/12 and house plot no.36 measuring to an extent of 2200 = 5 cents and 20 sq.ft including pathway rights comprised in S.F.No.22/12 both now sub-divided as S.F.No. 2/6

22/12A1 and 22/12A2 located at Paranjothi Nagar, Echaneri Village, Madurai East Taluk, Thamaraipatti Sub-Registry, Madurai North Registration District, Madurai District, based on his online application No. 2023/0105/24/510010 vide Can No.133131422519386 dated 24.05.2023 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 03.08.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, Government Advocate for R.1 to R.4 Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel for R.5 Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R.6 Mr.G.Suriyananth, Additional Government Pleader for R.9 *****

ORDER

The petitioner has submitted an application for issuance of patta and with a grievance that her application has not been considered, she has filed this writ petition for a mandamus.

3/6

2.When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate, on written instructions, submitted that the petitioner's application was duly considered and it was rejected. 3.Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Advocate, this writ petition is closed. The petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. Index :

Yes / No 29.08.2023 NCC :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes gk To 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai District - 625 001.

2.The Thasildar, Madurai Taluk Office (East), Madurai District - 625 107.

3.The Surveyor, Surveyor Department, East Taluk Office, Narasingam Road, Othakadai, Madurai - 625 107.

4/6

4.The Village Administrative Officer, VAO Office, Veerapanchan Village, 5.The Inspector of Police, Sliman Police Station, 5/6

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

gk 29.08.2023 6/6