← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/21666/2025disposed of

Ramkumar V v. The Director General Of Police

2025-08-11Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 11/08/2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP (MD). No.21666 of 2025 Ramkumar V ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Director General of Police, Head of Police Force, Tamilnadu, Chennai - 4. 2.The Inspector General of Police, Armed Services, Tamil Nadu Special Police, Kilpauk, Chennai, ... Respondents (2nd respondent was suo motu impleaded vide order dated 11.08.2025) PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to take into account to specialist training undergone, tests passed and other merits on the basis of service records, including AIR and the seniority in the immediate feeder category etc., while revising seniority of personal in the promoted categories viz. Havildar, Sub Inspector and Inspector by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 10.07.2025.

1/5

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gowrishankar For Respondents : Mr.SRA.Ramachandran for R1 Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

By consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

2. This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus to direct the respondent to take into account the specialist training undergone, tests passed and other merits on the basis of service records, including AIR and the seniority in the immediate feeder category etc., while revising seniority of personal in the promoted categories viz. Havildar, Sub Inspector and Inspector by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 10.07.2025.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that he made a representation for revision of seniority and promotion vide representation dated 10.07.2025. Since the same has not been considered so far, the petitioner is before this Court.

2/5

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

5. The learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that the authority competent to consider the representation of the petitioner is the Inspector General of Police, Armed Services, Tamil Nadu Special Police, Kilpauk, Chennai, whereas without impleading him, the writ petition has been filed.

5. In view of the said submission, the Inspector General of Police, Armed Services, Tamil Nadu Special Police, Kilpauk, Chennai, is suo motu impleaded as respondent No.2.

6. Considering the limited scope of the matter, without adverting to the merits or the contentions made, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent/Inspector General of Police, Armed Services, Tamil Nadu Special Police, Kilpauk, Chennai, to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt 3/5

of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall also annexe a copy of the representation along with this order in order to enable the 2nd respondent/Inspector General of Police, Armed Services, Tamil Nadu Special Police, Kilpauk, Chennai, to pass orders. No costs. 11.08.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No RR To 1.The Director General of Police, Head of Police Force, Tamilnadu, Chennai - 4. 2.The Inspector General of Police, Armed Services, Tamil Nadu Special Police, Kilpauk, Chennai, 4/5

M.DHANDAPANI,J RR

ORDER

IN WP(MD) No.21666 of 2025 Date : 11/08/2025 5/5