← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/21456/2021disposed of

Eswaran R v. The District Collector

2021-12-03Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana,Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.12.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN R.Eswaran ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Inspector of Police, M.Puthupatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to consider petitioner's representation for releasing of timber lorry bearing with No.TN 20 BK 7544 from the Tahsildar Office at Sivakasi.

For Petitioner : Mr.Maheswaran M/s.C.Susi Kumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.) The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for a direction upon the respondents herein to consider petitioner's representation for releasing of timber lorry bearing registration No.TN 20 BK 7544 from the Tahsildar Office at Sivakasi.

2. Heard Mr.Maheswaran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Subbaraj, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3. An identical issue has been considered by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in W.P(MD)No.3998 of 2021 (M.Subbaiah Page 1/3

vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Virudhunagar District) and this Court has closed the Writ Petition, giving liberty to the petitioner to work out the remedy in the manner known to law. Relevant portion of the said order is extracted hereunder:

"2.We have already held that remedy open to the petitioner is to approach the jurisdictional designated Court and not to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court. This is also for the reason that power of confiscation is available to the designated Court. Though an FIR has been registered, the offence involved would include Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals Act. Such a situation has already been taken note of by way of a clarification by us indicating the procedure to be followed. Thus, the present writ petition stands closed giving liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law in tune with the order of the Division Bench. In the event of filing a petition before the jurisdictional designated Court, the said Court is expected to dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of such an application. No costs."

4. In tune with the order of the Division Bench, if the petitioner files a petition before the jurisdictional designated Court, such Court shall dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of such application.

5. In the light of the above order, the writ petition stands disposed of with similar observations made in W.P(MD).No.3998 of 2021. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS I) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) sj Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

Page 2/3

To 1.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srivilliputhur.

2.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

4.The Inspector of Police, M.Puthupatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

+1 CC to M/s.C.SUSIKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-37373[F] dated 06/12/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-37420[F] dated 06/12/2021 ) 03.12.2021 MGJ(14.12.2021) 3P 7C Page 3/3