← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15475/2023dismissed

G.Mohanbabu v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-12-21Honourable Mr Justice V.Sivagnanam3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21/12/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V. SIVAGNANAM

1. G.Mohanbabu,

2. R.Govindharaj,

3. Jothi, ... Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 to 3 Vs The Inspector of Police, Mudukulathur Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

Cr.No.136/2023.

... Respondent/Complainant Gurusamy ...Intervener/ Defacto Complainant in CRL MP(MD)No. 16926 of 2023 For Petitioners : M/s. Dhilipan Pandian R L,Advocate. For Respondent : Mrs.M.Aasha, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For intervenor : Mr. B.Arun , Advocate in CRL MP(MD)No. 16926 of 2023 PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 136/2023 on the file of the respondent Police.

1/3

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners / accused apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 498(A), 294(b), 324, 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1981 in Crime No.136 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners herein and other accused have demanded additional dowry from the defacto complainant and they have also criminally intimidated her and caused grievous injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The leaned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that due to the matrimonial dispute, a false case has been foisted against the petitioners and seeks anticipatory bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioners herein have criminally intimidated the defecto complainant and caused grievous injuries and hence, he strongly, opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Today, the victim present before this court and admitted that all the petitioners assaulted her and caused severe injuries to her.

6. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners 2/3

and the defacto complainant and Government Advocate, I find no ground in this petition and accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 21/12/2023 / TRUE COPY / /01/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I /II /III /IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TRP TO THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUDUKULATHUR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.R.L.DHILIPAN PANDIAN, Advocate ( SR-18195[I] dated 21/12/2023 ) +1 CC to M/s.B.ARUN, Advocate ( SR-18274[I] dated 22/12/2023 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15475 of 2023 Date :21/12/2023 PKP/JGB/SAR- /04.01.2024/ 3P/ 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 3/3