Annalakshmi v. The State Of Tamilnadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 09/09/2024 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Annalakshmi ... Petitioner/Accused Rank Not Known Vs The Inspector of Police, Ammayanaickanur Police Station, Dindigul District.

Crime No. 230/2024..

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : R. Senthil Kumar, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.230 of 2024 on the file of the Respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent 1/4

police for the offences punishable under Sections 178, 180, 181 and 182 of the Bharathiya Nyaya Sanhita(BNS), in Cr.No.230 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the other accused are said to have printed the fake currencies. Hence, the complaint. 3.Heard both sides.

4.Considering the nature of the allegations that the accused has confessed that in the place of the petitioner also they used to print fake notes and considering the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner that except that piece of confession, there are no other material as against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Nilakottai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m, for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; (c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 09/09/2024 / TRUE COPY / /09/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

3/4

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, NILAKOTTAI.

2 DO-THROUGH :

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDUGAL DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMMAYANAICKANUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.R.SENTHIL KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-11041[I] dated 09/09/2024 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15132 of 2024 Date : 09/09/2024 BV/SAR- /20/09/2024/4P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 4/4