Chinnaveerappan.V v. The Authorized Officer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.11.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD and W.M.P(MD)No.17175 of 2022 V.Chinnaveerappan ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Authorized Officer, State Bank of India, Zonal Office, 2.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Balasamudram Branch, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District.

... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned attachment order cum demand notice vide RC.No.456 of 2018, dated 01.09.2022 and consequential sale notice vide RC.No.456 of 2018, dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai and quash the same.

1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vijayanand For R - 2 : Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned attachment order cum demand notice vide RC.No.456 of 2018, dated 01.09.2022 and consequential sale notice vide RC.No.456 of 2018, dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal,

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent submitted that the entire loan amount had already been settled and therefore, nothing survives in this Writ Petition for adjudication.

2/4

3. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [R.M.D.,J.] [J.S.N.P.,J.] Index : Yes / No 15.11.2022 Internet : Yes ps To 1.The Authorized Officer, State Bank of India, Zonal Office, 2.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Balasamudram Branch, Palani Taluk, Dindigul District.

3/4

R.MAHADEVAN ,J.

and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.

ps ORDER MADE IN DATED : 15.11.2022 4/4