← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14577/2019dismissed

K. Uvaisulkarni v. The Superintendent Of Police

2019-10-16Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14577 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.10.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14577 of 2019 K.Uvaisulkarni

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police Trichy District 2.The Inspector of Police Manaparai Police Station Trichy District 3.The Sub Inspector of Police Manaparai Police Station Trichy District 4.Vinodkumar 5.Kala@ Kalaiselvi 6.Vishva

...Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and his family members to run his business peacefully at Door No.43/3, Railway Station Road, Manaparai Town in Trichy District until the civil dispute in O.S.No.1130 of 2018 pending on the file of the I Additional Sub Court, Trichy and O.S.No.203 of 2019 pending on the file of the District Munsif Court, Manaparai.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Malaikani For Respondents : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi No.1 to 3 Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking direction to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and his family members to run his business peacefully at Door No.43/3, Railway Station Road, Manaparai Town in Trichy District until the civil dispute in O.S.No.1130 of 2018 pending on the file of the I Additional Sub Court, Trichy and O.S.No.203 of 2019 pending on the file of the District Munsif Court, Manaparai.

2. It is seen that the petitioner is a tenant under the fifth and sixth respondent. The petitioner also filed a suit in O.S.No.203 of 2019 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Manaparai. The respondents 5 and 6 and their family members have also filed a suit for partition in O.SNo.1130 of 2018 in which also the petitioner is a party.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14577 of 2019

3. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) would submit that the third respondent closed the complaint as civil in nature. 4.At this stage, police protection cannot be provided to the petitioner. Hence the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. However the petitioner is directed to approach the civil court in the manner known to law.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS III) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) aav To

1. The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police Trichy District 2.The Inspector of Police Manaparai Police Station Trichy District 3.The Sub Inspector of Police Manaparai Police Station Trichy District 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court +1 CC to M/s.S.MALAIKANI, Advocate ( SR-92170[F] dated 16/10/2019 ) Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14577 of 2019 16.10.2019 KK/SAR/04.11.2019/2P-6C/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2