Madras High CourtWP(MD)/21799/2019disposed of

Samudeeswari v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2019-10-16Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

W.P (MD).No. 21799 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.10.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P (MD).No. 21799 of 2019 Samundeeswari .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer Ramanathapuram District 2.The Tahsildhar Ramanathapuram Taluk Ramanathapuram District

3. The Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram District

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram District

5. The Inspector of Police Bazaar Police Station Ramanathapuram .. Respondents Prayer : This petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 to 5 to consider the representation dated 24.9.2019 of the petitioner and to give police protection to her life and limb and to enable her to fence the Property in Survey No.268/19 in Soorankottai Village, Ramnad Taluk and District measuring 38 cents as surveyed and demarcated by the second respondent For Petitioner : Mr.T.R.Jeyapalam For Respondents : Mr.R.Anandharaj Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 3 to 5 to consider the representation dated 24.9.2019 of the petitioner and to give police protection to her life and limb and to enable her to fence the property in Survey No.268/19 in Soorankottai Village, Ramnad Taluk and District measuring 38 cents as surveyed and demarcated by the second respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P (MD).No. 21799 of 2019

2. On the complaint lodged by the petitioner dated 24.09.2019, the fifth respondent conducted enquiry and closed the complaint as civil in nature. Admittedly suit was filed by one Sabari in O.S.No.139 of 2019 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ramanathapuram for the very same dispute in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.268 of 2019 situated at Soorankottai Village, Ramanathapuram Taluk and District measuring 38 cents. Further it is also seen that already the petitioner paid requisite fee to survey his land. In this regard, there is dispute and as such counter party namely one Sabari filed the above suit and it is still pending.

3. Therefore till the outcome of the suit, police protection cannot be granted to the petitioner. However the petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate petition before the civil court for appropriate relief in the manner known to law.

4. With the above direction, the Writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD I) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) aav To

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer Ramanathapuram District 2.The Tahsildhar Ramanathapuram Taluk Ramanathapuram District

3. The Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram District

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram District

5. The Inspector of Police Bazaar Police Station Ramanathapuram +1 CC to M/s.T.R.JEYAPALAM, Advocate ( SR-92762[F] dated 18/10/2019 ) W.P (MD).No.21799 of 2019 16.10.2019 KK/SAR/24.10.2019/2P-7C/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2