P.Rengaraj v. The Tahsildar

W.P(MD)No.21883 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.10.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR W.P(MD)No.21883 of 2019 P.Rengaraj ... Petitioner vs.

The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Vedasandhur, Vedasandhur Taluk, Dindigul District.

... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent herein to remove the wrong entries in revenue account of the properties situated at Dindigul District, Vedasandhur Village, Kottanatham Revenue Village S.F.Nos.587/2C2, 506/1G, 532/3B, 599/4C, 599/4E, 549/1, 550, 548/3B, 549/4, 549/5, 545/2B, 548/3B & 588/1 in the light of the petitioner representation dated 26.08.2019.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundar For Respondent : Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar, Additional Government Pleader.

ORDER

After some arguments, learned counsel for writ petitioner seeks permission to withdraw instant writ petition, but makes a plea that the rights of writ petitioner may please be preserved for giving a more comprehensive representation to the Revenue Authority concerned along with other legal heirs and giving more particulars about the names sought to be deleted. 2.Permitted to withdraw.

3.Learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file. Endorsement is reiterated.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P(MD)No.21883 of 2019

4. In the light of the endorsement and reiteration of the same, instant Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn albeit preserving the rights of the writ petitioner in the aforesaid manner. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ps To The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Vedasandhur, Vedasandhur Taluk, Dindigul District.

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-93123[F] dated 18/10/2019 ) W.P(MD)No.21883 of 2019 17.10.2019 KM/(30.10.2019) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2