Madras High CourtWP(MD)/22277/2024dismissed as infructuous

A.Ramalingam v. The Engineer-In-Chief And Chief Engineer (General), Wrd

2025-03-27Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu,Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date : 27/03/2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY WP(MD). No.22277 of 2024 and WMP(MD) Nos.18853 & 18854 of 2024 A.Ramalingam ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Engineer-In-Chief and Chief Engineer (General), Wrd, Office of the Engineer-In-Chief and Chief Engineer (General), Water Resource Department, Chepauk,Chennai..

2. The Chief Engineer, Madurai Region, Wrd, Office of the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Madurai Region, Thallakulam, Madurai..

3. The Superintendent Engineer, (Tirunelveli Circle),, Public Works Department (Wro) Chittar Basin Division, Public Works Department Complex, Tirunelveli District..

1/5

4. The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (Wro) Chittar Basin Division,Courtallam, Tenkasi District..

5. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (Wro) Chittar Basin Division, Tenkasi District..

6. The Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department (Wro) Chittar Basin Division, Tenkasi District..

7. Anand, Government Contractor, 24-B1, Muthuramalingapuram Street, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District..

... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1 and 2 respondents to take action against the erred authorities on the basis of the representation dated 20.08.2024 and 27.08.2024 in connection with the Tender notification in Reference Number.

3SE/TBC/TNY/2023-2024(3) with Tender ID. 2024_WRD_416478_1 dated 25.01.2024 issued by the 3rd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.A.C.Vinayagarajan For Respondents : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar for R1 to R6 Government Pleader 2/5

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.) When the writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader would submit that the prayer that has been sought for has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

[J.N.B.,J] [S.S.Y.,J] 27.03.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No RR 3/5