Madras High CourtWP(MD)/23724/2022disposed of

Ponnusamy v. Home, Prohibition And Excise Department

2022-11-15Honourable Mr Justice Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.11.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP W.P.(MD)No.23724 of 2022 Ponnusamy ... Petitioner /vs./

1. The Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Secretariat, Chennai- 600 009.

2. The Director General of Police Mylapore, Chennai- 600 004.

3. The Inspector General of Police Central Zone, Tiruchirapalli.

4.The Deputy Inspector General of Police Tiruchirapalli Range, Tiruchirapalli.

5. The Superintendent of Police Tiruchirapalli.

6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Manaparai Sub Division, Manapparai, Tiruchirapalli District 1/6

7. Kannan Sub Inspector of Police Thuvarankurichi Police Station Manapararai Sub Division

8. The Sub Inspector of Police Thuvarankurichi Police Station Manapararai Sub Division ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take appropriate action against the Respondents 6, 7 and 8 based on the Petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2022, 03.06.2022 and 04.06.2022 given to the fourth Respondent, 3rd Respondent, 2nd Respondent and to the 1st Respondent respectively.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.M.Madasamy For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The Petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take appropriate action against the 2/6

Respondents 6, 7 and 8 based on the Petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2022, 03.06.2022 and 04.06.2022 given to the fourth Respondent, 3rd Respondent, 2nd Respondent and to the 1st Respondent respectively.

2. It is the submission of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Respondents have not business in interfering with the agricultural lands and direct the Petitioner to execute settlement deed in favour of the sixth Respondent.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that as per the photos enclosed in the typed set of papers there is no mango trees, it is only vacant(dry) lands.

4. In view of the same, the Respondents 4 to 8 are directed not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the Petitioner in the agricultural land belonging to him.

3/6

5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. 15.11.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No aav TO:

1. The Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Secretariat, Chennai- 600 009.

2. The Director General of Police Mylapore, Chennai- 600 004.

3. The Inspector General of Police Central Zone, Tiruchirapalli.

4.The Deputy Inspector General of Police Tiruchirapalli Range, Tiruchirapalli.

5. The Superintendent of Police Tiruchirapalli.

6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Manaparai Sub Division, Manapparai, Tiruchirapalli District 4/6

7. The Sub Inspector of Police Thuvarankurichi Police Station Manapararai Sub Division

8. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP , J.

aav W.P.(MD)No.23724 of 2022 15.11.2022 6/6