Mannan Sports And Recreation Club v. The Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.09.2024 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Mannan Sports & Re-creation Club, Rep.by its President, M.Kamalathasan.
: Petitioner Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Melur Sub Division, Madurai District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Karunkalakudi Police Station, Madurai District.
: Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the third respondent herein from interfering with the day today activities of the petitioner's Mannan Sports and Recreation Club situated at 5/9 Bye Pass Main Road, Karunkalakudi, Melur Taluk, Madurai District - 625 101 in the light of the petitioner's representation, dated 26.06.2024. 1/4
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Senguttuarasan For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor.
O R D E R
The Writ Petition has been filed seeking orders, forbearing the third respondent herein from interfering with the day today activities of the petitioner's Mannan Sports and Recreation Club situated at 5/9 Bye Pass Main Road, Karunkalakudi, Melur Taluk, Madurai District - 625 101 in the light of the petitioner's representation, dated 26.06.2024.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner would rely on the decision of this Court in W.P.Nos.26397 and 27246 of 2017 (M.M.Nagar Sports and Recreation Centre represented by its Secretary P.Kanniappan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Kancheepuram District and others) dated 04.02.2022, wherein, a learned Judge of this Court after elaborate discussion has issued some directions taking note of the Nine Judge Bench judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Justice K.S.Puttasamy and another Vs. Union of India and others reported in (2017) 10 SCC 1.
2/4
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents would submit that the writ petitioner may be directed to follow the above guidelines.
4. In view of the above, the writ petitioner as well as the respondent police are directed to follow the directions issued by this Court in M.M.Nagar Sports and Recreation Centre's case above referred.
5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
18.09.2024 NCC : Yes/ No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No das 3/4
K.MURALI SHANKAR, J das To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Melur Sub Division, Madurai District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Karunkalakudi Police Station, Madurai District.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Order made in 18.09.2024 4/4