Jeyalakshmi v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.11.2022 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Jeyalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

2.The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Tuticorin District.

(Crime No.909 of 2015) ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second respondent police to investigate the case in Crime No.909 of 2015 dated 16.10.2015 and file a final report within a period as stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.M.Priscilla Jancy For Respondents : Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the Second Respondent to complete the investigation in Crime No.909 of 2015 and file a final report early.

1/4

2.When the matter was called, there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the Respondent submitted that in this case the petitioner had not furnished any document and the accused is absconding.

4.In view of the above, the Petitioner, who is the defacto complainant, is directed to co-operate with the pending investigation as per the reported ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalitha Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh reported in 2013 (6) CTC 353. On such furnishing of the relevant document by the petitioner, the Investigation Officer is directed to complete the investigation within a reasonable period. 5.With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

14.11.2022 Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Rmk 2/4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

2.The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Tuticorin District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J., Rmk 14.11.2022 4/4