Chandrasekar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 01.09.2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD)No.15940 of 2023 Chandrasekar ... Petitioner/Accused Rank Not Known Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kalakkad Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.335 of 2023) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajesh, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambiselvan, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.335 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for 1/4

the offences punishable under Section 379 IPC in Crime No.335 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons illegally transported one unit of river sand by using tractor. Hence the case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the accused persons illegally transported one unit of river sand. That apart, the petitioner is having one previous case. Hence, he objected to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.Heard both side and perused the materials available on record. 6.Considering the rival submissions on either side and considering the quantity of material and also considering the nature of offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: 7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned 2/4

Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 01/09/2023 / TRUE COPY / /09/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

gns 3/4

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALAKKAD POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15940 of 2023 Date :01/09/2023 SSA/VRS/13.09.2023/4P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 4/4