← Library
Madras High CourtREV.APLC(MD)/131/2024dismissed

P.M.Sheeba, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2025-07-15Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.07.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Rev.Aplc(MD)No.131 of 2024 in W.A(MD)No.1151 of 2019 P.M.Sheeba ... Petitioner/Appellant No.2 Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Education, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

3.The Chief Educational Officer of Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

4.The District Educational Officer, Kuzhithurai at Marthandam, Kanyakumari District.

...Respondents/Respondents

5.Abraham Memorial Higher Secondary School, Maruthancode, Kanyakumari Ditrict - 629 163, Rep. by its Correspondent.

... Respondent No.5/Appellant No.1 1/4

PRAYER: Review Application is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 & 2 r/w Section 114 of C.P.C., to review the order dated 17.12.2020, passed in W.A(MD)No. 1151 of 2019, on the file of this Court.

PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside order dated 19.08.2019 passed in W.P(MD)No.2384 of 2016, on the file of this Court.

For Petitioner :

M/s.M.Mohamed Zamil for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents :

Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4 * * * * *

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] The review application has been instituted to review the order dated 17.12.2020, passed in W.A(MD)No.1151 of 2019. 2.The learned Counsel appearing for the review petitioner would contend that the student strength from English medium also to be taken into consideration for the purpose of determining the surplus teacher. These are all 2/4

the merits, which were adjudicated both by the learned Single Judge and by the Division Bench of this Court. Re-adjudication for review is impermissible in the review petition. Grounds for appeal cannot be considered in the review petition. Only in the event of an error apparent, the power to review is to be exercised but not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioner is unable to establish any error apparent but offended to raise grounds on merits which deserve no consideration.

3.Accordingly, this Review Application stands dismissed. No costs. [S.M.S., J.] [B.P., J.] 15.07.2025 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No RJR/NST 3/4

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

and B.PUGALENDHI, J.

RJR/NST To 1.The Secretary, Department of Education, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

3.The Chief Educational Officer of Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

4.The District Educational Officer, Kuzhithurai at Marthandam, Kanyakumari District.

Rev.Aplc(MD)No.131 of 2024 in W.A(MD)No.1151 of 2019 15.07.2025 4/4