Shreedharan, v. The District Collector,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.10.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA Shreedharan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Kannyakumari District.

2.The Tahsildar, Vilavancode Taluk, Kannyakumari District.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Midalam Village, Kannyakumari District.

4.Leema Rani .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to include survey No.17/34 of Midalam Village in Patta No. 3389 of petitioner and may consequently direct the 3rd respondent reveive the land tax from the petitioner for resurvey Nos.17/16 and 17/34 of Midalam Village.

For Petitioner :

Mr.A.Balakrishnan For R1- R3 :

Mr.B.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed for a mandamus to the 1st and 2nd respondents to include survey No.17/34 of Midalam Village in Patta No. 3389 of petitioner and may consequently direct the 3rd respondent revive the land tax from the petitioner for resurvey Nos.17/16 and 17/34 of Midalam Village.

2. The learned Additional Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents would submit that the request would be considered and orders would be passed within a period of eight weeks.

3. Recording the same, a mandamus is issued to the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the request of the petitioner and pass orders within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No costs. 24.10.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes gbg To 1.The District Collector, Kannyakumari District.

2.The Tahsildar, Vilavancode Taluk, Kannyakumari District.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Midalam Village, Kannyakumari District.

P.T.ASHA, J.

gbg 24.10.2024