Chintamani v. The State Of Tamilnadu,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30.03.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Chintamani
...Petitioner/Accused
Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, NIB-CID, Madurai City.
(Crime No. 4 of 2024 )
...Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioner : Mr.Senthilvel for Mr.G.Hari haran Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 4 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police. 1/7
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.11.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 22(c), 25 and 29(1) of NDPS Act in Crime No. 4 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 22.02.2024, the petitioner and other accused were in illegal possession of contraband such as Amphetamine, Pseduo Ephedrine, etc. Hence the case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and she was falsely implicated in this case and she has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that no contraband was recovered from this petitioner and entire contraband was recovered from A1 and based on the confession of the co-accused, the petitioner has been arrayed as A6. He would further submit that already co-accused were granted bail by this Court. He would further submit that she has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.11.2024. Therefore, prayed to grant bail for the 2/7
petitioner.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would admit that no contraband was recovered from this petitioner and entire contraband was recovered from A1 and based on the confession of the co-accused, the petitioner has been arrayed as A6 and co-accused were already arrested and released on bail by this Court. He would further submit that the petitioner has no previous case. However, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, nature of offence, and also considering the facts that though the quantity of contraband is commercial quantity, the entire contraband was recovered from A1 alone and no any contraband was recovered from this petitioner and no previous case is pending against the petitioner and co-accused were already arrested and released on bail 3/7
by this Court and also considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner from 11.11.2024, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Special Judge, Principal Special Court for Trial of NDPS Act cases, Madurai, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the learned Principal Special Judge, Principal Special Court for Trial of NDPS Act cases, Madurai, on all working days at 10.30 a.m. and 5.00 p.m, until further orders;
[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected;
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
4/7
[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.
(P D B J) 30.03.2026 apd 5/7
To 1.The Principal Special Judge, Principal Special Court for Trial of NDPS Act cases, Madurai 2.The Inspector of Police, NIB-CID, Madurai City.
3. The Superintendent, Special Prison for Women, Puzhal, Chennai. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
6/7
P. DHANABAL, J apd
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No. 13734 of 2025 Date : 30.03.2026 7/7