← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/3625/2017dismissed for nonprosecution

A.Sheik Maideen v. Kodaikanal Municipality

2020-07-13Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

W.P.(MD).Nos.3625 & 5052 of 2017 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.07.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD).Nos.3625 and 5052 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.2921, 4070 & 4071 of 2017 W.P.(MD).No.3625 of 2017 A.Sheik Maideen

...Petitioner

Vs.

Kodaikanal Municipality, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District, Represented by its Commissioner.

...Respondent

PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relates to the impugned demand notice issued by the respondent herein in his proceeding No.Na.Ka.No.6730/2016/A3, dated 16.02.2017 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen W.P.(MD).No.5052 of 2017 A.Sheik Maideen

...Petitioner

Vs.

Kodaikanal Municipality, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District, Represented by its Commissioner.

...Respondent

PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relates to the impugned demand notice issued by the respondent herein in his proceeding No.Na.Ka.No.4413/2014/A4, dated 16.03.2017 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.T.S.Mohamed Mohideen https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD).Nos.3625 & 5052 of 2017 COMMON ORDER The petitioner's counsel had informed this Court that he had returned the papers to the writ petitioner. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the Writ Petitions stand dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) tsg Note:

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO The Commissioner, Kodaikanal Municipality, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District, COMMON ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).Nos.3625 & 5052 of 2017 13.07.2020 KG(CO) TR(22.07.2020) 2P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2