Hindu Nadar Uravinmurai, v. The Chief Educational Officer,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.06.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.4720 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3774 to 3776 of 2017 Hindu Nadar Uravinmurai, Nilakottai, (Registration No.46 of 2015) represented by its President, O.S.N.M.Narayanan, Son of Marimuthu Nadar, (aged about 74 years), Door No.12-1-1A/24, Shanmuga Nagar, Nilakottai-624208, Dindigul District.

... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Chief Educational Officer, Dindigul.

2.The District Educational Officer, Dindigul.

3.S.Mala Manimegalai Then District Educational Officer, Dindigul, Presently Chief Educational Officer, Krishnagiri.

1/4

4.Hindu Nadar Educational Trust, rep. by its Managing Trustee, A.Suseendran, Son of Arunachalam, Door No.15-15-16, Mariamman Kovil Street, Nilakottai.

5.A.Suseendran 6.S.P.Pandiyarajan 7.R.Suresh Babu 8.N.B.Karumalai Pandiyan 9.P.Jayapandian 10.N.Sathish Kumar 11.Ponnusamy Nadar 12.R.Vivekanandan 13.K.Gurumurthi 14.R.Annalango 15.P.Ganavel 16.R.Rajendran 17.R.Jeyaprakasam 18.N.Mohan ... Respondents 2/4

Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 15.11.2016 in Na.Ka.No. 3136/A4/2016 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and consequently, approve the representatives nominated by the petitioner society through its representation dated 29.02.2016 as members of the school committee of Nilakottai Hindu Nadar Uravinmurai Nadar High School, Nilakottai.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan for Mr.T.R.Jeyapalam For R1 to R3 : Mr.V.OM.Prakash Government Advocate For R4 to R18 : Mr.B.Rooban

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. The petitioner questions the impugned order whereby the appointment of the fifth respondent as Secretary of the School Committee was approved. Since the period had already expired, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition. However, I leave open all the contentions of the petitioner.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

rmi

3. The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 29.06.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Dindigul.

2.The District Educational Officer, Dindigul.

3.Then District Educational Officer, Dindigul, Presently Chief Educational Officer, Krishnagiri.

W.P.(MD)No.4720 of 2017 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3774 to 3776 of 2017 4/4