R.Ganesan, S/O.Ramaiah Thevar, v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.11.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.3996 and 3997 of 2017 R.Ganesan ... Petitioner versus

1. The District Collector/Chairman, District Rural Development Agency, Pudukottai.

2. The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Pudukottai.

3. The Executive Engineer (RD), District Rural Development Agency, Pudukottai.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to accept the tender schedule forms submitted by the petitioner for the works covered in Sl.No.19, 20 & 21, 31, 32 & 33, 37, 38 & 39 of Tender Notification dated 06.03.2017 (THAI-II 2016-2017) 1/4

and scrutinize the same without insisting the production of certificate from the 3rd respondent and finalise the tender process in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Arun Jayatram For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

28.11.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

2/4

To

1. The District Collector/Chairman, District Rural Development Agency, Pudukottai.

2. The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Pudukottai.

3. The Executive Engineer (RD), District Rural Development Agency, Pudukottai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 28.11.2023 4/4