R.Appanaraj, v. The Chief Secretary
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.08.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE R.Appanaraj ... Petitioner -vs1.The Chief Secretary Fort St.George, Secretariat Chennai-9 2.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Revenue Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk Chennai 3.The State of Tamilnadu rep.by its Secretary Revenue Department Fort St.George, Chennai-9 4.The Secretary to Government Tamilnadu Backward Classes and Most Backward Class Welfare (BCC) Department Secretariat, Chennai-9
5.The District Collector Tuticorin District Tuticorin ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.10.2018 in the light of the order passed by Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal Nos.9334, 9335 and 9336 of 2018 arising out of SLP No.5588, 5589 and 7651 of 2006 respectively, dated 11.09.2018 and also direct the fifth respondent to include the petitioner's name in the panel list of Deputy Tahsildar for the year 2018, for Tuticorin District. For Petitioner :
Mr.S.Arivalagan For Respondents :
Mr.G.Suriya Ananth Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has now become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.
2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
20.08.2024 NCC :
Yes / No Index :
Yes / No Internet :
Yes / No krk To:
1.The Chief Secretary, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-9.
2.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai.
3.The Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Tamilnadu, Fort St.George, Chennai-9.
4.The Secretary to Government, Tamilnadu Backward Classes and Most Backward Class Welfare (BCC) Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.
5.The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
krk 20.08.2024