Samykannu v. Thangavel
Crl.R.C(MD)No.935 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.R.C(MD)No.935 of 2021 Samykannu ...Revision Petitioner/Petitioner Vs.
1. Thangavel
2. T.Vasanthi
3. Gunasekaran
4. Ramaraj
5. Muniyappan @ Ammasi
6. Maran
7. Subramani
8. Kuppusamy
9. Pitchaiyammal
10. Veerammal ... Respondents/ Accused Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397, r/w.401 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records pertaining to the orders dated 02.11.2021 passed in Crl.M.P No.2977 of 2021 (CNR No.TNDG0C0039652021) on the file of the Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur and set aside the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Kannan
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order dated 02.11.2021 passed in Crl.M.P No.2977 of 2021 (CNR No.TNDG0C0039652021) on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur.
2.On perusal of complaint lodged by the petitioner revealed that there is a love affair existed between one Ragatharani and one Sivaraj, who is the son of his sister-in-law and due to which, there was dispute between the parties. Further, there is no material to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
Crl.R.C(MD)No.935 of 2021 show regarding the existence of relationship between them. Further alleged that on 19.09.2021, the respondents 1 to 10 threatened the petitioner with dire consequences. However, there is absolutely no material to attract any offence as alleged by the petitioner. Therefore, the Court below rightly dismissed the petition and this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the impugned order passed. 3.Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a private complaint, in the manner known to law, if so advised.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) PNM Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To The Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur.
+1 CC to M/s.D.BALAMURUGAPANDI, Advocate ( SR-11306[F] dated 10/03/2022 ) Crl.R.C(MD)No.935 of 2021 09.03.2022 RD(21.03.2022) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2