← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/19217/2022dismissed

Meenambal v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-03-13Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

CRL OP(MD).No.19217 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 13/03/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD).No.19217 of 2022 Meenambal ... Petitioner/De-facto Complainant Vs.

1.The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Sivagangai District Crime Branch, Sivagangai.

(In Crime No.19 of 2022) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Sulochana 3.Mohan Chakkravarthy 4.Selvameenal 5.Usha Rani ... Respondents 2 to 5/Accused Nos.1 to 4 For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vinayagan, Advocate.

For R1 : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R3 - R5 : Mr.R.M.Arunswaminathan, Advocate PETITION FOR CANCELLATION OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.439(2) of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- To pass an order by cancelling the anticipatory bail, granted to the respondents 2 to 5 in Crl.M.P.No.3291 of 2022 on the file of Principal Sessions Court, Sivagangai, dated 12.08.2022. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the respondent Nos.2 to 5 by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Sivagangai, vide order, dated 12.08.2022 made in Crl.M.P.No.3291 of 2022 on the ground that the respondents 2 to 5 suppressing the earlier petition filed for anticipatory bail, filed the second anticipatory bail petition before the Court below and obtained anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

CRL OP(MD).No.19217 of 2022 2.On perusal of records it is revealed that there is a previous enmity between the parties with regard to property dispute. That apart, since there are no previous antecedents as against the respondents 2 to 5, the Court below granted anticipatory bail with condition that the respondent Nos.2 to 5 shall report before the respondent police daily at 09.00 a.m., until further orders, without fail. They also appeared before the respondent police and duly complied with the conditions imposed by the Court below. 3.In view of the aforestated facts, this Court finds no grounds to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the respondent Nos.2 to

5. Therefore, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. However, the first respondent police is directed to complete the investigation and file a final report within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. sd/- 13/03/2023 / TRUE COPY / /04/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

vsd TO 1 THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, SIVAGANGAI.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.VINAYAGAN K Advocate SR.No.15462[F]

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19217 of 2022 Date :13/03/2023 RS/VR/SAR-1(10.04.2023) 2P 5C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2