G.Kannadasan, S/O.Govindaraj v. The Chairman,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)Nos.6284 to 6287 and 6057 of 2017 G.Kannadasan Na.Ka.No.821/08 dated 29.01.2010 and to grant permanent status to W.P.(MD)No.6285 of 2017 V.Annadurai 1/5
Na.Ka.No.822/08 dated 29.01.2010 and to grant permanent status to W.P.(MD)No.6286 of 2017 V.Rajan 2/5
Na.Ka.No.800/08 dated 29.01.2010 and to grant permanent status to W.P.(MD)No.6287 of 2017 S.Kandasamy Na.Ka.No.810/08 dated 29.01.2010 and to grant permanent status to W.P.(MD)No.6057 of 2017 K.Sivasankar 3/5
Na.Ka.No.819/08 dated 29.01.2010 and to grant permanent status to (In all cases) For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents : M/S.P.Malini for Mr.T.S.Gopalan & Co for R1 to R3
O R D E R
This Writ Petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to implement the order passed by Inspector of Labour, Karur in Na.ka.No.821/08, dated 29.01.2010 and to grant permanent status to the petitioner.
2. The issue of granting permanent status, the respondent has filed a writ appeal in W.A.(MD)No.1340 to 1343 of 2012, dated 11.07.2012 and that was confirmed by the Supreme Court in SLP No.24740 and 24741 of 2012. However, the issue was re-agitated in certain writ petitions and writ appeals. Now the issue is pending in Review Application No.210 and 212 of 2016. The writ petitioners are granted liberty to submit a representation to the respondents, after the disposal of the said review application and the respondent are directed to consider the representation based on the order that would be passed in the Review applications. Therefore, this Court is disposing the writ petitions with the above direction. 4/5
3. With the above direction, all the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) jbr Note:
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.
To +1 CC to M/s.A. RAHUL, Advocate ( SR-16983[F] dated 06/04/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.P. MALINI, Advocate ( SR-17379[F] dated 08/04/2022 ) W.P.(MD)Nos.6284 to 6287 and 6057 of 2017 06.04.2022 RK(04/05/2022) 5P 6C 5/5