A.Arockiamary, v. The Tahsildar,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.02.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI A.Arockiamary

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Athur Taluk, Dindigul District.

2.Rabel

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to cancel the patta granted in favour of the second respondent and to issue patta in the petitioner's name for her property in Survey No.138/C4A,1 38/7C4B situated at Vakkampatty Village, Athur Taluk, Dindigul District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 21.03.2016 within the period stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.J.K.Jeyaselvam Government Advocate 1/4

O R D E R

This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus, directing the first respondent to cancel the patta granted in favour of the second respondent and to issue patta in the petitioner's name for her property in Survey No.138/C4A,1 38/7C4B situated at Vakkampatty Village, Athur Taluk, Dindigul District, by considering the her representation dated 21.03.2016, within the period stipulated by this Court.

2.On 09.02.2023, when this writ petition was taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was ordered to be listed on 10.02.2023, under the caption "for dismissal". Even today (10.02.2023), there is no representation for the petitioner.

3.In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

10.02.2023 Index:Yes Internet:Yes vrn 2/4

To The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Athur Taluk, Dindigul District.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

vrn Order made in 10.02.2023 4/4