K.Palanichamy, S/O.Karuppaiah v. The Commissioner Of Police

W.P.(MD).No.10929 of 2016 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.07.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.(MD).No.10929 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD).No.8471 of 2016 K.Palanichamy : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police (Law and Order), Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai.

3.S.Susai Amalraj 4.S.Punitha : Respondents PRAYER : Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents No.2 from interfering in the civil dispute and compelling the delivery of the possession to respondent Nos.3 and 4 pertaining to the petitioners Shop namely Seethalakshmi Mess in an extent of 20 * 20 Sq. ft. situated at the western side entrance of the New Central Market in Mattuthavanai, Melur Road, Madurai District.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R3 & R4 : Mr.R.Venkatesan https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD).No.10929 of 2016

O R D E R

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the prayer sought for the petitioner has become infructuous.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To

1. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police (Law and Order), Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai.

Order made in W.P.(MD).No.10929 of 2016 Dated:

30.07.2019 CS(09.10.2019) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2