N.Subbiah, S/O.S.Nagu Reddiyar v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.02.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.94 of 2016 N.Subbiah ... Petitioner versus

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Korampallam - 628 101,

3. The Assistant Director Panchayat, Office of the Panchayat, Tuticorin.

1/4

4. The Block Development Officer, Vilathikulam,

5. The Tahsildar, Vilathikulam,

6. Pathammal ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 07.11.2015 and to investigate the matter and take necessary action against the 6th respondent for producing forged documents at the time of election held in the year 2011 and to remove her from the post of President K.Sundaraswarapuram, Ayan Boomaiyapuram Post, Vilathikulam Taluk, Tuticorin District.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.N.Raja Mohammed For R1 to R5 : Mr.A.Kannan, Additional Govt. Pleader

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has 2/4

also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 10.02.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet : Yes / No.

To

1. The Secretary to Government, Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Korampallam - 628 101,

3. The Assistant Director Panchayat, Office of the Panchayat, Tuticorin.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy

4. The Block Development Officer, Vilathikulam,

5. The Tahsildar, Vilathikulam, 10.02.2023 4/4