A. Juliet v. The State Of Tamilnadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI A.Juliet ... Petitioner versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, directing the respondent to complete the speedy enquiry on the complaint dated 20.07.2025 and to take necessary action in accordance with law within the time stipulated.

For Petitioner : Mr.Vishnu.J For Respondents : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azaad, Government Advocate (Crl Side)

ORDER

The petitioner with a grievance that his complaint has not been enquired by the respondent police has filed this petition. 1/4

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl Side) appearing for the respondent submits that they have not received any complaint from the petitioner.

3.Though the petitioner claims that he has lodged a complaint, he is not having any acknowledgement for the same. Therefore, this court is not inclined to grant any relief as sought for. However, the petitioner shall lodge another complaint through registered post within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such complaint, the respondent shall conduct an enquiry and take a decision on merits within a period three weeks therefrom. 4.This petition is closed with the above direction. 20.08.2025 DSK 2/4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch-II, Madurai District.

Copy to The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

DSK 20.08.2025 4/4