← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18509/2022granted

S.Natarajan v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-10-18Honourable Mr Justice A.A.Nakkiran3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18/10/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.A.NAKKIRAN S.Natarajan ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Manapparai, Trichy District.

(Crime No.16 of 2022).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Prahalad Ravi B, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.16 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused herein, who was arrested on 16.07.2022 for the offence punishable under sections 417, 376(2)(1), 506(i)IPC in Crime No. 16 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused promised to marry the victim, who is a physically challenged person. Believing his words, they had sexual intercourse and after she became pregnant and demanded him to marry, he failed to do so and also threatened with dire consequence. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The petitioner is in custody from 16.07.2022. Hence, seeks bail.

1/3

4. On the side of prosecution, it is stated that in this case most part of the investigation was completed and DNA report is not yet received. The petitioner is aged about 54 years and the victim is aged about 24 years. On promising to marry the victim, the accused had physical relationship. Considering the gravity of offence, prayed to dismiss the petition.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, that the major part of investigation was completed and also considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner on certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai.

(i)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

(ii)the petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10:30am, until further orders;

(iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness; iv)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial. v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. vi)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 18/10/2022 / TRUE COPY / 18/10/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAPPARAI, TRICHY DISTRICT.

2. DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY.

4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MANAPPARAI, TRICHY DISTRICT.

5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.B.PRAHALAD RAVI, Advocate ( SR-11603[I] dated 18/10/2022 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18509 of 2022 Date :18/10/2022 pnm USK/SSS/SAR- /18.10.2022/3P/7C 3/3