Ramar v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Ramar ... Petitioner versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppuvanam Police Station, Sivagangai District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to take appropriate action on the petitioner's complaint in CSR No.567 of 2025, dated 17.04.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Jeyaram Sidharthi For Respondents : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl Side) 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner has lodged a complaint before the respondent police that he has been cheated by one Pandian and has filed this petition for a direction to the respondent police to take action on his complaint.

2.The learned Government Advocate (crl side) appearing for the respondent police submits that the complaint of the petitioner has been enquired in CSR No.567 of 2025 on 17.04.2025 and has been closed on 21.05.2025.

3.Recording the above submission, this petition is closed. The respondent police shall furnish the closure report to the petitioner enabling him to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 20.08.2025 DSK 2/4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppuvanam Police Station, Sivagangai District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

DSK 20.08.2025 4/4