M.Packiyaraj v. The Secretary To The

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Thirtieth day of June Two Thousand and Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.VELMURUGAN HCP(MD) No.949 of 2017 (In the matter of produce the detenu namely Malthurai, son of Linga Pandy, aged about 38 years, who is the Son of petitioner herein under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) LINGA PANDY ... PETITIONER Vs 1 STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY THE SECRETARY, HOME(PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT,CHENNAI-600 009 2 THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MADURAI RANGE AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TIRUNELVELI CITY-627 002(FULL ADDITIONAL CHARGE) 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL PRISON, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI ...

RESPONDENTS To 1 THE SECRETARY, STATE OF TAMIL NADU, HOME, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, ST. GEORGE FORT, CHENNAI-600 009.

1.The Registrar General, High Court,Chennai-104. FOR R1 2.The District Munsif, Tirunelveli. FOR R2 3.The District Munsif of Madurai. FOR R3 (In duplicate with copies for immediate service and return with covering letter) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

WHEREAS upon motion this day made unto this Court by MR.P.KRISHNAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the Respondents praying this Court to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to the Detention Order No. 36/BCDFGISSSV/2017 dated 12/06/2017 passed by the Second Respondent under Tamil Nadu Act 14/1982 and quash the same and direct the respondent to produce the detenu Malthurai aged about 38 years, son of Linga Pandy now confined in Central Prison, Madurai before this Honourabel court and set the detenu Malthurai aged about 38 years, son of Linga Pandy, set him at liberty.

WHEREAS this Court hath directed issue of notice, returnable by Friday the Twenty Eighth day of July Two Thousand and Seventeen (28/07/2017) to the respondents herein to show cause why this petition should not be complied with.

Now take notice that you, namely 1 THE SECRETARY STATE OF TAMILNADU, HOME, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, ST. GEORGE FORT, CHENNAI-600 009. 2 THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MADURAI RANGE AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TIRUNELVELI CITY-627 002(FULL ADDITIONAL CHARGE) 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL PRISON, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI the respondents herein are hereby directed to appear in person or by Advocate before this MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI at 10.30 a.m. on Friday the Twenty Eighth day of July Two Thousand and Seventeen(28/07/2017) to show cause why this petition should not be complied with.

HEREIN FAIL NOT.

WITNESS the Honourable Ms.INDIRA BANERJEE, The Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicature at Madras this day of Friday, the Thirtieth day of June Two Thousand and Seventeen.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(Records) ORDER DATED : 30.06.2017 HEARING DATE : 28.07.2017 NOTICE HCP(MD)NO.949 OF 2017 VB/JC/10.07.2017/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/