S.Jeya Sarala Devi v. Mookaiah

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 09.11.2022

CORAM

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.A.NAKKIRAN Crl.M.P(MD)No.12745 of 2022 in CRL OP(MD). No.17433 of 2022 S.Jeya Sarala Devi

...Petitioner/Defacto

Complainant Vs

1. Mookaiah

2. Karthick @ Karthick Kannan

3. Manikandan @ Manikanda Prabhu

...Respondents/Petitioners/

Accused No.1 to 3

4. State rep.by The Inspector of Police, S.S. Colony Police Station, Madurai District.

(Crime No.1879/2022) ... Respondent/Respondent/ Complainant PRAYER: This Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying this Court to cancel the Anticipatory Bail granted in favour of the respondents 1 to 3/accused Nos.1 to 3 in the above Crl.O.P.No.17433 of 2022 dated 29.09.2022.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Vishnu, Advocate For 4th Respondent : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (crl.side)

ORDER

By order dated 29.09.2022, this Court granted anticipatory bail to the respondents 1 to 3/Accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crl.O.P(MD)No.17433 of 2022. Now, the petitioner/defacto complainant filed this petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner/defacto complainant would submit that the respondents are threatened the defacto complainant to withdraw her complainant. He would further submit that the respondents 1 to 3 have money and muscle power and hence, they are trying to close the First Information Report. Hence, he prayed for cancellation of anticipatory bail. 3.The learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that after considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, this Court granted anticipatory bail to the respondents 1 to 3 and the same needs no interference.

4.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the fourth respondent would submit that the investigation in this case has been completed and the charge sheet will be filed within a month.

5. It is seen that the petitioner has not given any complaint to prove his contention. Hence, this Court is not inclined to allow this petition. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. The respondent police is directed to file the charge sheet within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Sd/- 09/11/2022 / TRUE COPY / /11/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

skn To

1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, S.S. COLONY POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. C.C. to M/S.J.SULTHAN BASHA Advocate SR.No.12805

ORDER

IN CRL MP(MD) No.12745 of 2022 IN CRL OP(MD) No.17433 of 2022 Date :09/11/2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SP/BUC/SAR /24/11/2022/2P/4C