Madras High CourtWP(MD)/13793/2016dismissed

Smt. A.Sundarambal, v. The District Collector,

2020-11-05Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.13793 of 2016 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.(MD)No. 13793 of 2016 and WMP (MD) No.10278 of 2016 A. Sundarambal

...Petitioner

-Vs1. The District Collector, Dindigul.

2. The Sub-Collector, Palani, Dindigul District.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul.

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palani, Dindigul District.

5. The Inspector of Police, Palani Adivaram Police Station, Palani, Dindigul District.

6. K. Vidya Shankar

7. K.G. Venkataraman

8. K.R.G. Sundaram

9. K.S. Ganesh

10. K.R. Sriram

11. K.C. Krishnan

12. N. Soundarrajan

13. S. Ponram ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Aricle 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to give adequate police protection to protect the petitioner and his property of an extent of 46 cents in Town Survey No.958/2, Ward III, Block No.23, Palani Adivaram, Palani Town and Taluk, Dindigul District.

For Petitioner :

M/S. A.L. Ganthimathi For R-1 to R-5 :

M/s. M. Ananthadevi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R-6 to R-13 :

Mr.V. Chandrasekar

O R D E R

This Writ petition is filed seeking direction to the respondents 1 to 5 to give adequate police protection to protect the petitioner and his property of an extent of 46 cents in Town Survey https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.13793 of 2016 No.958/2, Ward III, Block No.23, Palani Adivaram, Palani Town and Taluk, Dindigul District.

2. The learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 would submit that, based on a complaint of the petitioner, the fifth respondent police has registered a case in Crime No.285 of 2016, for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 443, 447, 506(2) and 379 of IPC. After registering the case, the fifth respondent police has conducted a detailed enquiry and found that no offence is made out and no prima facie is made out to proceed with the FIR and therefore, the same was closed on 27.07.2016 as 'Mistake of Fact'. 3.Recording the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate (crl. side), this petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ksa Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy,shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

1. The District Collector,Dindigul.

2. The Sub-Collector,Palani, Dindigul District.

3. The Superintendent of Police,Dindigul.

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,Palani, Dindigul District.

5. The Inspector of Police, Palani Adivaram Police Station,Palani, Dindigul District. 6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,Madurai.

W.P.(MD)No.13793 of 2016 05.11.2020 (CO) AP(23/11/2020) 2P 7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2