← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18710/2022granted

Mujaihideen @ Mohamed Mujayudeen v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2022-10-19Honourable Mr Justice A.A.Nakkiran3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19/10/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.A.NAKKIRAN Mujahideen @ Mohamed Mujayudeen ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State Rep. By, The Sub Inspector of Police, Silaiman Police Station, Madurai City.

(Crime No.346 of 2022) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.346 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 427, 451, 506(ii) IPC and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.346 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous motive, on 23.09.2022 at about 7.00 p.m., the petitioner and other accused persons assaulted the de-facto complainant and his family members with wood and abused them in filthy language, threatened them with dire consequences and also caused damage to his two wheeler and television. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case, due to previous enmity. He would further submit that co-accused were already granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.17847 of 2022 and Crl.O.P(MD)No.17374 of 2022, dated 06.10.2022. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. 1/3

4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) would submit that it is a case in counter. He would further submit that the petitioner is having one previous case. He would further submit that investigation is still pending and hence, he strongly opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the nature of offence and the co-accused have already granted anticipatory bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) to the credit of the Head Mistress, MDU East PU Primary School, Y.Othakadai, Madurai (SBI Bank, CIF No.80080760812, A/c No.10111536270, IFSC No.SBIN0002246), Phone No.2422950, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court and produce the receipt/acknowledgement before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai.

7.On production of such receipt, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation;

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; 2/3

(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 19/10/2022 / TRUE COPY / /11/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, MADURAI.

2. DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SILAIMAN POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

COPY TO :

THE HEAD MISTRESS, MDU EAST PU PRIMARY SCHOOL, Y.OTHAKADAI, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18710 of 2022 Date :19/10/2022 vsd USK/SSS/SAR-I/01.11.2022/3P/6C 3/3