Vimal @ Dhana Vimal v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15481 of 2019
1. Vimal @ Dhana Vimal 2.Raja @ Rajarajan ...
Petitioners/Accused No.1 & 2 Vs.
1. The State Rep.by the The Inspector of Police, Keeramangalam Police Station Pudukottai District ... Respondent/Complainant 2.Suresh ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records in Crime No.103 of 2019 dated 05.09.2019 pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, Keeramanagalam Police Station, Pudukottai District and quash the same as against the petitioners.
For Petitioners : Mr.D.Rameshkumar For R-1 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl. side)
ORDER
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in Crime No.103 of 2019 , on the file of the first respondent police, for an alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 324,307 of IPC and Section 27(1) of Arms Act 1959 2.The case is still at the stage of investigation. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves. 3.A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court which have been signed by the petitioners and the second respondent and also by their respective counsel. The petitioners and the second respondent were also present in person before this Court and they were identified by Mr.Rajendran,SI of Police. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending before the respondent
police. Even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the First Information Report in Crime No.103 of 2019 pending on the file of the first respondent police.
5.This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.103 of 2019, on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. The petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as costs, to the credit of the Chief Justice Relief Fund (payable in Accounts Section of the High Court Registry), within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. Further each of the petitioners are directed to pay a sum of Rs.5000/- to the victim.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) aav ENCL.: XEROX COPY OF JOINT COMPROMISE MEMO.
To 1.The Inspector of Police, Keeramangalam Police Station Pudukottai District 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
COPY TO The Section Officer,Accounts Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. (2 copies) +1CC TO MR.D.RAMESH KUMAR, Advocate Sr. No. 94206 Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15481 of 2019 24.10.2019 NS(CO) TR(07.11.2019) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/