Nallapitchan v. The Joint Commissioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.10.2024 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and C.M.P(MD)Nos.13517 and 13518 of 2024 Nallapitchan ... Appellant vs.

1. The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Dindigul.

2. The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Dindigul.

3. The Thakkar / Executive Officer, A/m. Mariyamman Temple, Natham Town and Taluk, Dindigul District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Natham, Dindigul District.

5. V.Chinna Manjapoosi ... Respondents Page No.1 of 4

Prayer : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order dated 07.08.2024 in W.P(MD)No.18776 of 2024. For Appellant : Mr.V.Karuna For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.P.Maharajan, Special Government Pleader

JUDGMENT

(Judgement of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) We do not find this appeal could be entertained. The learned Single Judge has, in fact, recorded an arrangement reached by the parties and has disposed of the writ petition. It is now claimed that the counsel who have appeared for the appellant / writ petitioner was not authorised to enter into such arrangement. We do not think we can go into the said question in this appeal. Hence, leaving it open to the appellant / writ petitioner to move the learned Single Judge by way of review or otherwise, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.S.M, J.) (L.V.G, J.) 04.10.2024 Index : No : No bala Page No.2 of 4

To

1. The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Dindigul.

2. The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Dindigul.

3. The Thakkar / Executive Officer, A/m. Mariyamman Temple, Natham Town and Taluk, Dindigul District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Natham, Dindigul District.

Page No.3 of 4

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

bala JUDGMENT MADE IN DATED : 04.10.2024 Page No.4 of 4